Hirovia
Honest comparison

Hirovia vs 人工筛选简历

这是大多数团队实际在做的事，值得被公平对待。人工筛选免费、灵活、不需要供应商，但它也是被 AI 代写申请伤得最重的方式。

Try Hirovia free See a real report

Five candidates free · no card · no sales call

How we write these. We describe 人工筛选简历 by how they publicly position themselves, we credit what they do better than us, and we don't quote prices we can't verify — check their current pricing directly. If you think anything here is unfair or out of date, tell us and we'll correct it.
Credit where it's due

What 人工筛选简历 is genuinely good at

  • 免费、即时，且完全由你掌控
  • 优秀的招聘官能读出任何测评都捕捉不到的背景与分寸
  • 小批量时表现很好——二十位申请人竞争一个专业岗位，本就是人能处理的规模
  • 没有新工具、没有数据处理协议、没有学习成本
The difference

Where Hirovia takes a different approach

文档已经不再区分人了

当所有申请都被同一批模型润色过，读得更仔细也找不回信号。

时间才是真正的成本

每份申请约两分半，1,000 份就是约 40 小时——花掉整整一周，换来一份事后无法解释的排序。

不同阅卷人之间的一致性

两位招聘官会把同一叠简历排出不同顺序，而同一套评分模型不会。

可解释性

面对被拒的候选人、用人经理或监管方，「感觉不错」是很弱的回答。

The short answer

Which one should you pick?

Choose 人工筛选简历 if…

你只招一个人，有二十位申请人，而且你本人熟悉这个市场。

Choose Hirovia if…

申请量已超出可用工时，或者这份名单必须能向别人解释清楚。

What you'd actually get

One score, and the evidence behind it

Whatever you compare us against, this is the output: every applicant ranked on the same 0–100 scale, with the components visible so any decision can be explained.

What their résumé says
What Hirovia measured
Candidate A

“Results-driven. Grew revenue 40%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 96%
89Interview first

Inside the target zones for the role. Validity checks clean.

Candidate C

“Results-focused. Grew revenue 42%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 97% — best of the pool
38Flagged

41 identical answers in a row and two failed attention checks.

The best paperwork belonged to the worst applicant. Why that keeps happening →

Other comparisons

See how we stack up elsewhere

对比 TestGorilla 对比 HireVue 对比 Criteria Corp 对比 Indeed Assessments

Judge it on your own applicants.

Five candidates free. No credit card, no demo, no sales call — the fastest way to settle any comparison.

Start free Ask us a hard question