Hirovia
面向 RPO 服务商与人力资源咨询机构

为你已经在运行的流程,加上一层可度量的能力评估。

你要为招聘质量负责,而不仅仅是交付数量。Hirovia 为你在所有客户、所有岗位上提供一致且经得起追问的评估层——以你的品牌,嵌入你的流程。

聊聊批量方案 See a real report

First 5 candidates free · no credit card · no sales call

按客户 账户与报表API 优先 融入现有技术栈0.25 美元 批量下每次测评
The situation

What this looks like day to day

招聘质量写在合同里

你按结果被考核,但筛选仍取决于是哪位顾问接了这个职位。

每个客户都想要不同的流程

当每个项目由不同的人按不同标准执行时,一致性很难承诺。

可解释性一年比一年重要

关于自动化招聘工具和偏见审计的规则正在到来,「我们看过简历」是很弱的回答。

What changes

How Hirovia fits

所有项目共用一套标准

无论由谁负责该职位,都使用同一套研究型成功画像与同一套评分。

支撑招聘质量对话的证据

分数分布、有效性提示与按客户出具的报表,可直接用于季度业务回顾。

为嵌入你的技术栈而设计

通过 API 创建候选人并获取分数;不想自建的部分可用邮件接入与门户。

全程都是你的品牌

候选人始终看不到 Hirovia。

The evidence

Identical on paper. Nothing alike, measured.

Three applicants for the same role. AI wrote all three résumés, and they read the same. The assessment doesn't.

What their résumé says
What Hirovia measured
Candidate A

“Results-driven. Grew revenue 40%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 96%
89Interview first

Behavior and judgment both inside the target zones. All validity checks clean.

Candidate B

“Results-oriented. Grew revenue 38%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 95%
74Interview, with a probe

Strong instincts, but one competency sits well below what the role needs.

Candidate C

“Results-focused. Grew revenue 42%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 97% — best of the three
38Flagged

41 identical answers in a row and two failed attention checks. On paper, your best applicant.

What they wrote, versus what they did. Why this gap keeps widening →

How it works

Four steps. Nothing changes about how you post jobs.

1
Post anywhere

Use the boards you already use.

2
Route applicants in

Bulk upload, email intake, branded portal, or API.

3
Everyone gets assessed

30 minutes, role-specific, under your company's name.

4
Interview the top of the list

Ranked, with reports and interview guides.

聊聊批量方案.

Five candidates free. No credit card, no demo, no sales call.

Create your account Ask a question