Hirovia
面向企业内部招聘团队

一个职位收到 900 份申请,团队却只有 10 场面试的时间。

Hirovia 针对该具体岗位评估每一位申请人,把排好序的候选名单直接交给招聘官,让面试时间用在最可能胜任的人身上,而不是简历写得最漂亮的人身上。

免费筛选下一个职位 See a real report

First 5 candidates free · no credit card · no sales call

900+ 每个职位的申请量约 40 小时 每次招聘节省的筛选时间20 个岗位配有研究型画像
The situation

What this looks like day to day

读不完的申请量

一个职位就能带来数百份申请,而且每一份看上去都很称职——因为是 AI 这样写的。

面试名额才是稀缺资源

用人经理每周只有几个小时。把这些时间花在纸面上好看的人身上,是代价最高的错误。

没人说得清名单是怎么来的

「感觉不错」经不起法务的追问,对下一轮招聘也没有任何帮助。

What changes

How Hirovia fits

全员测评,而非抽样

不是前五十个,而是全部——对照该岗位的成功画像逐一衡量。

一份可以解释的名单

每位候选人的分数会拆解为行为、判断、简历与书面证据,任何决定都能逐条说明。

面试提纲随候选人一起交付

针对本人薄弱环节的问题,让 45 分钟的面试真正物有所值。

与现有招聘系统并行

照常在原渠道发布职位。候选人可通过批量导入、邮件、门户或 API 接入。

The evidence

Identical on paper. Nothing alike, measured.

Three applicants for the same role. AI wrote all three résumés, and they read the same. The assessment doesn't.

What their résumé says
What Hirovia measured
Candidate A

“Results-driven. Grew revenue 40%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 96%
89Interview first

Behavior and judgment both inside the target zones. All validity checks clean.

Candidate B

“Results-oriented. Grew revenue 38%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 95%
74Interview, with a probe

Strong instincts, but one competency sits well below what the role needs.

Candidate C

“Results-focused. Grew revenue 42%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 97% — best of the three
38Flagged

41 identical answers in a row and two failed attention checks. On paper, your best applicant.

What they wrote, versus what they did. Why this gap keeps widening →

How it works

Four steps. Nothing changes about how you post jobs.

1
Post anywhere

Use the boards you already use.

2
Route applicants in

Bulk upload, email intake, branded portal, or API.

3
Everyone gets assessed

30 minutes, role-specific, under your company's name.

4
Interview the top of the list

Ranked, with reports and interview guides.

免费筛选下一个职位.

Five candidates free. No credit card, no demo, no sales call.

Create your account Ask a question