Hirovia
For in-house talent teams

Your job post got 900 applications. Your team has time for 10 interviews.

Hirovia assesses every applicant for the exact role and hands your recruiters a ranked shortlist, so interview time goes to the people most likely to succeed rather than the people who wrote the best résumé.

Screen your next posting free See a real report

First 5 candidates free · no credit card · no sales call

900+ applicants handled per posting~40 hrs screening removed per hire20 corporate roles with researched profiles
The situation

What this looks like day to day

Volume you can't read

A single posting draws hundreds of applications and every one of them looks competent, because AI wrote them that way.

Interview slots are the scarce resource

Your hiring managers have a handful of hours a week. Spending them on candidates who look good on paper is the expensive mistake.

Nobody can explain the shortlist

"It felt right" doesn't survive a conversation with legal, and it doesn't help the next hiring round either.

What changes

How Hirovia fits

Every applicant measured, not sampled

Not the first fifty. All of them, against the success profile for that specific role.

A shortlist you can defend

Each candidate's score breaks down into behaviors, judgment, résumé and written evidence — so any decision can be explained line by line.

Interview guides that come with the candidate

Questions aimed at that person's weak spots, so a 45-minute interview earns its place.

Runs alongside your ATS

Post where you already post. Route applicants in by bulk upload, email, portal or API.

The evidence

Identical on paper. Nothing alike, measured.

Three applicants for the same role. AI wrote all three résumés, and they read the same. The assessment doesn't.

What their résumé says
What Hirovia measured
Candidate A

“Results-driven. Grew revenue 40%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 96%
89Interview first

Behavior and judgment both inside the target zones. All validity checks clean.

Candidate B

“Results-oriented. Grew revenue 38%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 95%
74Interview, with a probe

Strong instincts, but one competency sits well below what the role needs.

Candidate C

“Results-focused. Grew revenue 42%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 97% — best of the three
38Flagged

41 identical answers in a row and two failed attention checks. On paper, your best applicant.

What they wrote, versus what they did. Why this gap keeps widening →

How it works

Four steps. Nothing changes about how you post jobs.

1
Post anywhere

Use the boards you already use.

2
Route applicants in

Bulk upload, email intake, branded portal, or API.

3
Everyone gets assessed

30 minutes, role-specific, under your company's name.

4
Interview the top of the list

Ranked, with reports and interview guides.

Screen your next posting free.

Five candidates free. No credit card, no demo, no sales call.

Create your account Ask a question