Hirovia
Honest comparison

Hirovia vs HireVue

HireVue is an enterprise platform built around structured video interviews and assessments, sold with implementation. Hirovia is a self-serve screening layer you can switch on this afternoon.

Try Hirovia free See a real report

Five candidates free · no card · no sales call

How we write these. We describe HireVue by how they publicly position themselves, we credit what they do better than us, and we don't quote prices we can't verify — check their current pricing directly. If you think anything here is unfair or out of date, tell us and we'll correct it.
Credit where it's due

What HireVue is genuinely good at

  • Structured video interviewing at large scale, with interview workflow built in
  • Deep enterprise integrations and the compliance apparatus large employers require
  • Job simulations and a long track record with very large employers
  • Dedicated implementation and customer success teams
The difference

Where Hirovia takes a different approach

No sales process to get started

Enterprise platforms typically involve demos, procurement and annual contracts. Hirovia is five candidates free, then from $1, with no conversation required.

We do not do video

This is a real difference, not a euphemism. If you want recorded video interviews scored at scale, we are not that product.

Screening rather than the whole funnel

Hirovia sits between the job post and the interview calendar. It ranks who deserves your time; it does not schedule, run or record the interview.

Priced for any size

The same product serves an eight-person business and a 6,000-applicant campaign.

The short answer

Which one should you pick?

Choose HireVue if…

You are a large enterprise wanting video interviewing, job simulations and a vendor with a dedicated implementation team.

Choose Hirovia if…

You want every applicant assessed and ranked without procurement, and you would rather run interviews yourself once you know who's worth interviewing.

What you'd actually get

One score, and the evidence behind it

Whatever you compare us against, this is the output: every applicant ranked on the same 0–100 scale, with the components visible so any decision can be explained.

What their résumé says
What Hirovia measured
Candidate A

“Results-driven. Grew revenue 40%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 96%
89Interview first

Inside the target zones for the role. Validity checks clean.

Candidate C

“Results-focused. Grew revenue 42%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 97% — best of the pool
38Flagged

41 identical answers in a row and two failed attention checks.

The best paperwork belonged to the worst applicant. Why that keeps happening →

Other comparisons

See how we stack up elsewhere

Judge it on your own applicants.

Five candidates free. No credit card, no demo, no sales call — the fastest way to settle any comparison.

Start free Ask us a hard question