Hirovia
Honest comparison

Hirovia vs Indeed Assessments

Indeed's assessments are free and attached to the job board where your posting already lives. Hirovia is independent of any board and goes considerably deeper.

Try Hirovia free See a real report

Five candidates free · no card · no sales call

How we write these. We describe Indeed Assessments by how they publicly position themselves, we credit what they do better than us, and we don't quote prices we can't verify — check their current pricing directly. If you think anything here is unfair or out of date, tell us and we'll correct it.
Credit where it's due

What Indeed Assessments is genuinely good at

  • Free, with no separate vendor to buy or configure
  • Built into a posting workflow many employers already use
  • Fine for a first-pass filter on straightforward attributes
  • Zero setup — it is simply there when you post
The difference

Where Hirovia takes a different approach

Independent of where you posted

Applicants arrive from many sources. Hirovia assesses all of them the same way, whether they came from a board, a referral or your careers page.

Role success profiles, not generic tests

Each of 20 roles has researched target zones per competency, so candidates are measured against what works in that job rather than against a general standard.

Validity checks that flag gamed responses

Attention checks, consistency pairs and straight-lining detection are central to the score.

A full report and interview guide per candidate

Not a pass mark — a breakdown you can act on and defend.

The short answer

Which one should you pick?

Choose Indeed Assessments if…

You post exclusively on one board, hire occasionally, and want a free rough filter with nothing to set up.

Choose Hirovia if…

Applicants come from several sources, the role matters, and you need ranking you can justify rather than a pass or fail.

What you'd actually get

One score, and the evidence behind it

Whatever you compare us against, this is the output: every applicant ranked on the same 0–100 scale, with the components visible so any decision can be explained.

What their résumé says
What Hirovia measured
Candidate A

“Results-driven. Grew revenue 40%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 96%
89Interview first

Inside the target zones for the role. Validity checks clean.

Candidate C

“Results-focused. Grew revenue 42%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 97% — best of the pool
38Flagged

41 identical answers in a row and two failed attention checks.

The best paperwork belonged to the worst applicant. Why that keeps happening →

Other comparisons

See how we stack up elsewhere

vs TestGorilla vs HireVue vs Criteria Corp vs manual screening

Judge it on your own applicants.

Five candidates free. No credit card, no demo, no sales call — the fastest way to settle any comparison.

Start free Ask us a hard question