Honest comparison

Hirovia vs Criteria Corp

Criteria is a long-established assessment provider with a strong psychometric heritage, generally sold on annual agreements. Hirovia is narrower in scope and sold per assessment.

Try Hirovia free See a real report

Five candidates free · no card · no sales call

How we write these. We describe Criteria Corp by how they publicly position themselves, we credit what they do better than us, and we don't quote prices we can't verify — check their current pricing directly. If you think anything here is unfair or out of date, tell us and we'll correct it.

Credit where it's due

What Criteria Corp is genuinely good at

A serious psychometric pedigree, including well-known cognitive aptitude testing
A broad catalogue spanning cognitive, personality and skills instruments
Long validation history and documentation, which matters in regulated hiring
Established support and guidance on defensible test use

The difference

Where Hirovia takes a different approach

Blended score, not separate instruments

Rather than several tests to interpret side by side, Hirovia blends behavior, judgment, résumé and written evidence into one comparable number per candidate.

Pay per completed assessment

No annual commitment. If you do not hire this quarter, you do not pay this quarter.

Written-answer analysis built for the AI era

Free-text answers are scored specifically for the generic, evidence-free register that generated text produces.

Set up without a conversation

No implementation project, no minimum term.

The short answer

Which one should you pick?

Choose Criteria Corp if…

You need a deep, heavily documented psychometric battery with formal validation evidence and vendor guidance, and an annual agreement is fine.

Choose Hirovia if…

You want fast, defensible ranking of a large applicant pool without an annual contract or a test-selection exercise.

What you'd actually get

One score, and the evidence behind it

Whatever you compare us against, this is the output: every applicant ranked on the same 0–100 scale, with the components visible so any decision can be explained.

What their résumé says

What Hirovia measured

Candidate A

“Results-driven. Grew revenue 40%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 96%

89Interview first

Inside the target zones for the role. Validity checks clean.

Candidate C

“Results-focused. Grew revenue 42%. Exceptional communicator.”

Keyword match 97% — best of the pool

38Flagged

41 identical answers in a row and two failed attention checks.

The best paperwork belonged to the worst applicant. Why that keeps happening →

Other comparisons

See how we stack up elsewhere

vs TestGorilla vs HireVue vs Indeed Assessments vs manual screening

Judge it on your own applicants.

Five candidates free. No credit card, no demo, no sales call — the fastest way to settle any comparison.

Start free Ask us a hard question